Michael Barba

A long-simmering dispute over the legality of San Francisco police using live surveillance finally went to court Friday, just days after Mayor London Breed set the stage for a larger showdown over surveillance that could end up being decided by voters this summer.

core/paragraph

A long-simmering dispute over the legality of San Francisco police using live surveillance finally went to court Friday, just days after Mayor London Breed set the stage for a larger showdown over surveillance that could end up being decided by voters this summer.

In October 2020, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and ACLU of Northern California sued police for gaining live access to a camera network in Union Square after a day of protests over the killing of George Floyd was followed by looting in May 2020.

In October 2020, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and ACLU of Northern California sued police for gaining live access to a camera network in Union Square after a day of protests over the killing of George Floyd was followed by looting in May 2020.

San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer <a href="https://www.eff.org/press/releases/livestreamed-hearing-friday-eff-will-ask-court-issue-judgment-against-sfpd-illegally">heard arguments in the case Friday</a>, but did not make a ruling. He continued the matter to Feb 1. At issue is whether police improperly accessed live footage and violated a local ordinance barring city agencies from using new surveillance technologies without prior approval from the Board of Supervisors.

San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer <a href="https://www.eff.org/press/releases/livestreamed-hearing-friday-eff-will-ask-court-issue-judgment-against-sfpd-illegally">heard arguments in the case Friday</a>, but did not make a ruling. He continued the matter to Feb 1. At issue is whether police improperly accessed live footage and violated a local ordinance barring city agencies from using new surveillance technologies without prior approval from the Board of Supervisors.

The civil liberties groups, which filed the lawsuit <a href="https://sfstandard.com/perspectives/san-francisco-police-illegally-used-surveillance-cameras-at-the-george-floyd-protests-the-courts-must-stop-them/">on behalf of three protesters</a>, say police clearly broke the law by gaining live access to the camera network before submitting a policy seeking approval from the Board of Supervisors to use the new technology. They accuse the police of using the camera network to spy on protesters.

The civil liberties groups, which filed the lawsuit <a href="https://sfstandard.com/perspectives/san-francisco-police-illegally-used-surveillance-cameras-at-the-george-floyd-protests-the-courts-must-stop-them/">on behalf of three protesters</a>, say police clearly broke the law by gaining live access to the camera network before submitting a policy seeking approval from the Board of Supervisors to use the new technology. They accuse the police of using the camera network to spy on protesters.

But the City Attorney’s Office, which is defending the police department, argues that police didn’t need approval because officers accessed the same camera network to live monitor the Pride Parade in June 2019—just one month before the ordinance went into effect.

But the City Attorney’s Office, which is defending the police department, argues that police didn’t need approval because officers accessed the same camera network to live monitor the Pride Parade in June 2019—just one month before the ordinance went into effect.

In court Friday, EFF attorney Saira Hussain argued that a single use of the camera network did not justify police continuing to use it after “the enactment of the ordinance.”

In court Friday, EFF attorney Saira Hussain argued that a single use of the camera network did not justify police continuing to use it after “the enactment of the ordinance.”

While acknowledging an officer looked at the live camera feed, Deputy City Attorney Wayne Snodgrass disputed the allegation that police spied on protesters.

While acknowledging an officer looked at the live camera feed, Deputy City Attorney Wayne Snodgrass disputed the allegation that police spied on protesters.

“She was using the laptop and camera network to monitor a physical area and ensure that it remained quiet, which it did,” Snodgrass said.

“She was using the laptop and camera network to monitor a physical area and ensure that it remained quiet, which it did,” Snodgrass said.

Regardless, Hussain said, police should not be “secretly” gaining live access to the camera network, because it could discourage protesters from participating in future demonstrations.

Regardless, Hussain said, police should not be “secretly” gaining live access to the camera network, because it could discourage protesters from participating in future demonstrations.

Both sides want to avoid going to trial. The judge could either rule in favor of the city and dismiss the case; rule in favor of the protesters and require police to get approval from the Board of Supervisors to use the camera network; or side with neither and send the case to trial.

Both sides want to avoid going to trial. The judge could either rule in favor of the city and dismiss the case; rule in favor of the protesters and require police to get approval from the Board of Supervisors to use the camera network; or side with neither and send the case to trial.

Friday&#8217;s hearing came on the heels of Breed <a href="https://sfstandard.com/city-hall/surveillance-mayor-breed-supervisors-sf-police-cameras/">picking a fight this week</a> with the Board of Supervisors over live surveillance. Last December, the mayor responded to another round of looting in Union Square—and pressure to clean up drug dealing in the Tenderloin—by announcing plans to give police more access to live camera networks. Those plans materialized Tuesday when she placed a measure on the June ballot to give police live surveillance without board approval.

Friday's hearing came on the heels of Breed <a href="https://sfstandard.com/city-hall/surveillance-mayor-breed-supervisors-sf-police-cameras/">picking a fight this week</a> with the Board of Supervisors over live surveillance. Last December, the mayor responded to another round of looting in Union Square—and pressure to clean up drug dealing in the Tenderloin—by announcing plans to give police more access to live camera networks. Those plans materialized Tuesday when she placed a measure on the June ballot to give police live surveillance without board approval.

Friday&#8217;s hearing came on the heels of Breed <a href="https://sfstandard.com/city-hall/surveillance-mayor-breed-supervisors-sf-police-cameras/">picking a fight this week</a> with the Board of Supervisors over live surveillance. Last December, the mayor responded to another round of looting in Union Square—and pressure to clean up drug dealing in the Tenderloin—by announcing plans to give police more access to live camera networks. Those plans materialized Tuesday when she placed a measure on the June ballot to give police live surveillance without board approval.

In turn, five members of the Board of Supervisors, including Supervisor Aaron Peskin, responded by putting their own measure on the ballot to maintain the existing ordinance and continue requiring police to get approval from the board.

In turn, five members of the Board of Supervisors, including Supervisor Aaron Peskin, responded by putting their own measure on the ballot to maintain the existing ordinance and continue requiring police to get approval from the board.

In a phone interview before the hearing, Mukund Rathi, an attorney with the EFF, said the mayor’s proposal would “gut” an ordinance designed to ensure oversight over city agencies using surveillance technologies.

In a phone interview before the hearing, Mukund Rathi, an attorney with the EFF, said the mayor’s proposal would “gut” an ordinance designed to ensure oversight over city agencies using surveillance technologies.

“We have a lot of concerns about this initiative,” Rathi said. “It seems like the police kind of see the criticism they are getting over their unauthorized use of surveillance technology, and so they are working with the mayor to kind of scrap the ordinance that they are trying to get around in the first place.”

“We have a lot of concerns about this initiative,” Rathi said. “It seems like the police kind of see the criticism they are getting over their unauthorized use of surveillance technology, and so they are working with the mayor to kind of scrap the ordinance that they are trying to get around in the first place.”

The camera network at the center of the debate is run by the Union Square Alliance, a community benefit district that uses funds from local property owners to make improvements in the area. The network was <a href="https://sfstandard.com/perspectives/perspective-surveillance-and-civil-liberties-are-both-crucial-to-fixing-san-francisco/">funded in part by crypto executive Chris Larsen</a>, who founded Ripple and has also paid for other camera networks in San Francisco.

The camera network at the center of the debate is run by the Union Square Alliance, a community benefit district that uses funds from local property owners to make improvements in the area. The network was <a href="https://sfstandard.com/perspectives/perspective-surveillance-and-civil-liberties-are-both-crucial-to-fixing-san-francisco/">funded in part by crypto executive Chris Larsen</a>, who founded Ripple and has also paid for other camera networks in San Francisco.

Lawsuit alleging SFPD illegally used live surveillance to spy on protesters finally gets its day in court

Zack Rosen

Andrew Sutherland

San Francisco tech leaders that haven’t yet <a href="https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/heatherknight/article/Tech-titans-give-S-F-the-finger-as-they-flee-15875504.php">decamped for Miami</a> are increasingly vocal in their opinions on San Francisco government, <a href="https://twitter.com/balajis/status/1489292360097824771">mocking</a> apparent government failings and treating us to endless versions of “I had a bad experience on the street. This must stop.”

San Francisco tech leaders that haven’t yet <a href="https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/heatherknight/article/Tech-titans-give-S-F-the-finger-as-they-flee-15875504.php">decamped for Miami</a> are increasingly vocal in their opinions on San Francisco government, <a href="https://twitter.com/balajis/status/1489292360097824771">mocking</a> apparent government failings and treating us to endless versions of “I had a bad experience on the street. This must stop.”

While these critiques are often valid, they miss a crucial and obvious point: Democracy is not a spectator sport. The tech community doesn’t get to just stand there and complain—we are a responsible party here, and it’s time to act like it. With all of the jobs, investments and employees tech brings to San Francisco, its leaders are part of the fabric of this city whether or not they understand their role.

While these critiques are often valid, they miss a crucial and obvious point: Democracy is not a spectator sport. The tech community doesn’t get to just stand there and complain—we are a responsible party here, and it’s time to act like it. With all of the jobs, investments and employees tech brings to San Francisco, its leaders are part of the fabric of this city whether or not they understand their role.

Yet we can still count on one hand the number of prominent technology leaders who have put their energy, money and time where their mouth is to improve the city. We often hear of the efforts of Marc Benioff of Salesforce and Chris Larsen of Ripple, but what about everybody else?

Yet we can still count on one hand the number of prominent technology leaders who have put their energy, money and time where their mouth is to improve the city. We often hear of the efforts of Marc Benioff of Salesforce and Chris Larsen of Ripple, but what about everybody else?

There are promising signs that more people in the tech community see the critical need for engagement. Serial entrepreneur Bob Epstein partnered with legislators and environmental advocacy organizations to enact the nation’s <a href="https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/fact-sheets/ab-32-global-warming-solutions-act-2006">first serious plan</a> to address climate change. California YIMBY, a group we’ve been involved with, was co-founded by tech and policy entrepreneurs and recently helped end exclusionary single-family home zoning in California. In San Francisco, GrowSF (advocating for good government) and Kid Safe SF (advocating for kid-safe streets) launched in the past year with co-founders from the tech industry.

There are promising signs that more people in the tech community see the critical need for engagement. Serial entrepreneur Bob Epstein partnered with legislators and environmental advocacy organizations to enact the nation’s <a href="https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/fact-sheets/ab-32-global-warming-solutions-act-2006">first serious plan</a> to address climate change. California YIMBY, a group we’ve been involved with, was co-founded by tech and policy entrepreneurs and recently helped end exclusionary single-family home zoning in California. In San Francisco, GrowSF (advocating for good government) and Kid Safe SF (advocating for kid-safe streets) launched in the past year with co-founders from the tech industry.

In San Francisco, this kind of civic leadership is often dismissed as rich people trying to push their preferred policies. But that’s often just a way of evading an honest conversation about policy options. And it also flies in the face of a long American tradition of industry leaders putting energy and resources into helping their communities. Yes, some moguls of the robber baron era were mainly interested in assuaging their guilt and burnishing their legacies with charitable works. Still, there are plenty of examples that don’t fit that narrative.

In San Francisco, this kind of civic leadership is often dismissed as rich people trying to push their preferred policies. But that’s often just a way of evading an honest conversation about policy options. And it also flies in the face of a long American tradition of industry leaders putting energy and resources into helping their communities. Yes, some moguls of the robber baron era were mainly interested in assuaging their guilt and burnishing their legacies with charitable works. Still, there are plenty of examples that don’t fit that narrative.

Consider the story of Nathan Straus. He built a fortune as one of the owners of Macy&#8217;s, but in the 1890s he became obsessed with food safety after losing two of his children to disease. He began by asking a simple question: Louis Pasteur had invented the milk pasteurization process in 1865, so why were kids still being routinely killed by unsafe milk decades later?

Consider the story of Nathan Straus. He built a fortune as one of the owners of Macy's, but in the 1890s he became obsessed with food safety after losing two of his children to disease. He began by asking a simple question: Louis Pasteur had invented the milk pasteurization process in 1865, so why were kids still being routinely killed by unsafe milk decades later?

Consider the story of Nathan Straus. He built a fortune as one of the owners of Macy&#8217;s, but in the 1890s he became obsessed with food safety after losing two of his children to disease. He began by asking a simple question: Louis Pasteur had invented the milk pasteurization process in 1865, so why were kids still being routinely killed by unsafe milk decades later?

What happened next is a lesson for today’s tech entrepreneurs. Rather than just leaving it there, Straus took his department store earnings, his skills at organization-building, and the doggedness of an entrepreneur and set out to solve the problem. First, he and his wife built a “milk laboratory” to produce sterilized milk in 1892, a time when 25% of infant mortality was tied to diseased milk. He then built a factory to supply New York orphanages with sterilized milk at subsidized rates. Overnight, sure enough, child mortality rates plummeted. Strauss then helped pass the nation&#8217;s first milk pasteurization laws, personally driving policy outcomes that saved hundreds of thousands of lives a year, many of them children. He made enemies in the process, but having a thick skin comes with the public policy territory.

What happened next is a lesson for today’s tech entrepreneurs. Rather than just leaving it there, Straus took his department store earnings, his skills at organization-building, and the doggedness of an entrepreneur and set out to solve the problem. First, he and his wife built a “milk laboratory” to produce sterilized milk in 1892, a time when 25% of infant mortality was tied to diseased milk. He then built a factory to supply New York orphanages with sterilized milk at subsidized rates. Overnight, sure enough, child mortality rates plummeted. Strauss then helped pass the nation's first milk pasteurization laws, personally driving policy outcomes that saved hundreds of thousands of lives a year, many of them children. He made enemies in the process, but having a thick skin comes with the public policy territory.

What happened next is a lesson for today’s tech entrepreneurs. Rather than just leaving it there, Straus took his department store earnings, his skills at organization-building, and the doggedness of an entrepreneur and set out to solve the problem. First, he and his wife built a “milk laboratory” to produce sterilized milk in 1892, a time when 25% of infant mortality was tied to diseased milk. He then built a factory to supply New York orphanages with sterilized milk at subsidized rates. Overnight, sure enough, child mortality rates plummeted. Strauss then helped pass the nation&#8217;s first milk pasteurization laws, personally driving policy outcomes that saved hundreds of thousands of lives a year, many of them children. He made enemies in the process, but having a thick skin comes with the public policy territory.

Tech leaders in San Francisco today should be asked the same question that was asked of Nathan Straus: Exactly what are you planning to do with the staggering amount of wealth and (potential) power you have accumulated in the process?

Tech leaders in San Francisco today should be asked the same question that was asked of Nathan Straus: Exactly what are you planning to do with the staggering amount of wealth and (potential) power you have accumulated in the process?

Firing off cathartic Tweets is a cheap and impotent form of democracy. Tech leaders, did you build your companies into an industry-changing force by complaining on the internet?

Firing off cathartic Tweets is a cheap and impotent form of democracy. Tech leaders, did you build your companies into an industry-changing force by complaining on the internet?

Like most things in life, the first step the tech community can take is simply showing up. Reach out to the elected leaders and see what problems they and you are both trying to solve. Ask them to explain where they are stuck and how you can help them.&nbsp;

Like most things in life, the first step the tech community can take is simply showing up. Reach out to the elected leaders and see what problems they and you are both trying to solve. Ask them to explain where they are stuck and how you can help them.&nbsp;

California YIMBY began after a trip to Sacramento, where our underprepared group stumbled around the Capitol building, knocking on doors and seeing who would meet with us about the housing crisis in California and pending legislation we wanted to see passed. We were surprised by how direct the Senators, Assemblymembers and their staff were with us. They told us to stop pointing out the obvious to them—they understood the housing crisis!—and sent us home with a list of homework assignments on policy design, lobbying and advocacy.&nbsp;

California YIMBY began after a trip to Sacramento, where our underprepared group stumbled around the Capitol building, knocking on doors and seeing who would meet with us about the housing crisis in California and pending legislation we wanted to see passed. We were surprised by how direct the Senators, Assemblymembers and their staff were with us. They told us to stop pointing out the obvious to them—they understood the housing crisis!—and sent us home with a list of homework assignments on policy design, lobbying and advocacy.&nbsp;

That original homework assignment soon spawned an organization—California YIMBY—now with 15 staff members. We have since become friends and trusted partners with California government leaders and have the privilege of playing a supporting role in helping them begin to solve the California housing crisis. This is the kind of work we will tell our grandkids about.

That original homework assignment soon spawned an organization—California YIMBY—now with 15 staff members. We have since become friends and trusted partners with California government leaders and have the privilege of playing a supporting role in helping them begin to solve the California housing crisis. This is the kind of work we will tell our grandkids about.

San Francisco is blessed with prosperity and a wealth of tech talent. The city government’s budget has grown from $6.4 billion in 2010 to $12.6 billion in 2020. San Francisco remains a stunningly beautiful city of enormous potential.

San Francisco is blessed with prosperity and a wealth of tech talent. The city government’s budget has grown from $6.4 billion in 2010 to $12.6 billion in 2020. San Francisco remains a stunningly beautiful city of enormous potential.

Yet, the gap between our stated values as a city (and the capabilities of its residents!) and our city&#8217;s governmental outcomes is only widening. Housing prices continue to skyrocket, our endemic homelessness problems are compounding and record numbers of students are leaving our public schools.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Yet, the gap between our stated values as a city (and the capabilities of its residents!) and our city's governmental outcomes is only widening. Housing prices continue to skyrocket, our endemic homelessness problems are compounding and record numbers of students are leaving our public schools.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Yet, the gap between our stated values as a city (and the capabilities of its residents!) and our city&#8217;s governmental outcomes is only widening. Housing prices continue to skyrocket, our endemic homelessness problems are compounding and record numbers of students are leaving our public schools.&nbsp;&nbsp;

If Nathan Straus was in a room of San Francisco tech leaders, we believe that he would have a simple message for us: If you are so passionate about these problems, then why are you not helping public leaders solve them?

If Nathan Straus was in a room of San Francisco tech leaders, we believe that he would have a simple message for us: If you are so passionate about these problems, then why are you not helping public leaders solve them?

Andrew Sutherland and Zack Rosen are technology company founders (Andrew founded Quizlet and Zack founded Pantheon.) They are both active in civic organizations such as California YIMBY, Kid Safe San Francisco and TechEquity Collaborative.

Andrew Sutherland and Zack Rosen are technology company founders (Andrew founded Quizlet and Zack founded Pantheon.) They are both active in civic organizations such as California YIMBY, Kid Safe San Francisco and TechEquity Collaborative.

Tech leaders: Stop whining about SF’s problems, and start helping

Opinion: Tech leaders: Stop whining about SF’s problems, and start helping

Anna Tong

The Castro Upper Market Community Benefit District (CBD) board unanimously voted to turn down a $695,000 grant to <a href="https://castrocbd.org/castro-community-benefit-district-safety-camera-program/">install a network of private safety cameras</a> Monday evening, ending a <a href="https://hoodline.com/2020/10/castro-district-group-delays-vote-on-security-cameras-after-significant-community-pushback/">months-long community fight</a> over whether or not to become the sixth CBD in San Francisco to operate a camera network intended to improve neighborhood public safety. The decision came despite evidence of support for the program, including a <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wtWM_M9ISCpf6drFfjkyI7d2CIT8kZVN/view?usp=sharing">community survey</a> that showed moderate support for cameras.

The Castro Upper Market Community Benefit District (CBD) board unanimously voted to turn down a $695,000 grant to <a href="https://castrocbd.org/castro-community-benefit-district-safety-camera-program/">install a network of private safety cameras</a> Monday evening, ending a <a href="https://hoodline.com/2020/10/castro-district-group-delays-vote-on-security-cameras-after-significant-community-pushback/">months-long community fight</a> over whether or not to become the sixth CBD in San Francisco to operate a camera network intended to improve neighborhood public safety. The decision came despite evidence of support for the program, including a <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wtWM_M9ISCpf6drFfjkyI7d2CIT8kZVN/view?usp=sharing">community survey</a> that showed moderate support for cameras.

The CBD’s initial camera program enthusiasm was no match for its opponents, who over the past few months mounted a <a href="https://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/turning-the-castro-into-a-surveillance-state-will-not-keep-us-safe/">vocal opposition campaign</a>, citing concerns over privacy and surveillance and claims that the CBD’s survey seemed designed to skew results. Not a single camera program supporter spoke up at Monday’s meeting. Thus chastised, the CBD board, one by one, each voted ‘No.’

The CBD’s initial camera program enthusiasm was no match for its opponents, who over the past few months mounted a <a href="https://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/turning-the-castro-into-a-surveillance-state-will-not-keep-us-safe/">vocal opposition campaign</a>, citing concerns over privacy and surveillance and claims that the CBD’s survey seemed designed to skew results. Not a single camera program supporter spoke up at Monday’s meeting. Thus chastised, the CBD board, one by one, each voted ‘No.’

“We are an unelected body that would be imposing a system on this neighborhood that I believe is really outside the scope of what the CBD ought to be doing, and there’s certainly a lot of opposition to it,” said board member Crispin Hollings, before he urged fellow board members to vote against accepting the grant.

“We are an unelected body that would be imposing a system on this neighborhood that I believe is really outside the scope of what the CBD ought to be doing, and there’s certainly a lot of opposition to it,” said board member Crispin Hollings, before he urged fellow board members to vote against accepting the grant.

Some San Francisco neighborhoods, including Fisherman’s Wharf and Japantown, have private networks of cameras in commercial corridors or residential neighborhoods. Placed on private property, they are intended to serve as an unbiased witness to crime and accidents, in addition to deterring crimes from happening in the first place.&nbsp;

Some San Francisco neighborhoods, including Fisherman’s Wharf and Japantown, have private networks of cameras in commercial corridors or residential neighborhoods. Placed on private property, they are intended to serve as an unbiased witness to crime and accidents, in addition to deterring crimes from happening in the first place.&nbsp;

<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img src="https://content.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/20210505-DSC_3748-2500x1921.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-4444"/><figcaption>The Castro Upper Market Community Benefit District voted against installing security cameras in the Castro district as part of a hotly-debated crime-fighting proposal. | Photo by Sophie Bearman</figcaption></figure>

core/image

<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img src="https://content.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/20210505-DSC_3748-2500x1921.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-4444"/><figcaption>The Castro Upper Market Community Benefit District voted against installing security cameras in the Castro district as part of a hotly-debated crime-fighting proposal. | Photo by Sophie Bearman</figcaption></figure>

The cameras are controlled by community non-profits: either <a href="https://oewd.org/community-benefit-districts">CBDs</a>, non-profits in commercial corridors that get their funding from special neighborhood taxes, or SF SAFE, a nonprofit that supports neighborhood watch groups and other public safety initiatives.

The cameras are controlled by community non-profits: either <a href="https://oewd.org/community-benefit-districts">CBDs</a>, non-profits in commercial corridors that get their funding from special neighborhood taxes, or SF SAFE, a nonprofit that supports neighborhood watch groups and other public safety initiatives.

Those in favor of the private cameras say that having footage in an accessible place and governed by a set of agreed-upon policies is an improvement on private citizens haphazardly posting Ring videos to Nextdoor, while ensuring that the neighborhood—not the City—controls the footage.

Those in favor of the private cameras say that having footage in an accessible place and governed by a set of agreed-upon policies is an improvement on private citizens haphazardly posting Ring videos to Nextdoor, while ensuring that the neighborhood—not the City—controls the footage.

Chris Larsen, the tech mogul who has been <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/10/business/camera-surveillance-san-francisco.html">providing funding to jumpstart these programs</a>, says he makes grants available to those who request them, but it’s ultimately up to local entities to decide whether or not to adopt a program. He funds a variety of public safety initiatives: in addition to the camera funding, Larsen has also provided $100,000 towards <a href="https://hoodline.com/2021/02/castro-cbd-launches-new-public-safety-ambassador-program/">a new Public Safety Ambassador program in the Castro</a>.&nbsp;

Chris Larsen, the tech mogul who has been <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/10/business/camera-surveillance-san-francisco.html">providing funding to jumpstart these programs</a>, says he makes grants available to those who request them, but it’s ultimately up to local entities to decide whether or not to adopt a program. He funds a variety of public safety initiatives: in addition to the camera funding, Larsen has also provided $100,000 towards <a href="https://hoodline.com/2021/02/castro-cbd-launches-new-public-safety-ambassador-program/">a new Public Safety Ambassador program in the Castro</a>.&nbsp;

&#8220;I&#8217;m from San Francisco, and I believe in this city&#8230;We work closely with people in the community who know how to best support residents and businesses in each neighborhood. Any project, including the funding of cameras, is driven and maintained by the community,” Larsen wrote in an email to Here/Say Media.

"I'm from San Francisco, and I believe in this city...We work closely with people in the community who know how to best support residents and businesses in each neighborhood. Any project, including the funding of cameras, is driven and maintained by the community,” Larsen wrote in an email to Here/Say Media.

&#8220;I&#8217;m from San Francisco, and I believe in this city&#8230;We work closely with people in the community who know how to best support residents and businesses in each neighborhood. Any project, including the funding of cameras, is driven and maintained by the community,” Larsen wrote in an email to Here/Say Media.

The Castro’s stance towards the camera program contrasts with other CBDs who have welcomed the grants. But the other CBDs that have implemented the cameras are mostly tourist neighborhoods: <a href="https://www.fishermanswharf.org/about-us/">Fisherman’s Wharf</a>, <a href="https://www.jtowncbd.org/japantown-safecity-camera-program">Japantown</a>, <a href="https://www.midmarketcbd.org/security-camera-network/">Mid-Market</a>, <a href="https://tlcbd.org/cameras">Tenderloin</a> and <a href="https://www.visitunionsquaresf.com/about-bid/services/security-camera-project">Union Square</a>. The Castro is a tourist destination but also a tight-knit community whose <a href="https://www.foundsf.org/index.php?title=Remembering_A_Police_Riot:_The_Castro_Sweep_of_October_6,_1989">history with police violence</a> has led to deep-rooted community concern around law enforcement and surveillance.

The Castro’s stance towards the camera program contrasts with other CBDs who have welcomed the grants. But the other CBDs that have implemented the cameras are mostly tourist neighborhoods: <a href="https://www.fishermanswharf.org/about-us/">Fisherman’s Wharf</a>, <a href="https://www.jtowncbd.org/japantown-safecity-camera-program">Japantown</a>, <a href="https://www.midmarketcbd.org/security-camera-network/">Mid-Market</a>, <a href="https://tlcbd.org/cameras">Tenderloin</a> and <a href="https://www.visitunionsquaresf.com/about-bid/services/security-camera-project">Union Square</a>. The Castro is a tourist destination but also a tight-knit community whose <a href="https://www.foundsf.org/index.php?title=Remembering_A_Police_Riot:_The_Castro_Sweep_of_October_6,_1989">history with police violence</a> has led to deep-rooted community concern around law enforcement and surveillance.

Those misgivings overrode the results of a <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/sh/usz4ggsn83zdg1g/AAA7IfT_57aOHzB3O4s7CMlea?dl=0&amp;preview=Castro+CBD+Camera+Survey+Prezo+1_2.pdf">community survey</a> of 774 residents, which found more support than opposition for the program: 62 percent of respondents said they would or might support a well-managed camera network. In addition, the survey found that cameras were more supported by respondents who both lived and worked in the Castro area, or by respondents who had personally been the victim of a crime.

Those misgivings overrode the results of a <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/sh/usz4ggsn83zdg1g/AAA7IfT_57aOHzB3O4s7CMlea?dl=0&amp;preview=Castro+CBD+Camera+Survey+Prezo+1_2.pdf">community survey</a> of 774 residents, which found more support than opposition for the program: 62 percent of respondents said they would or might support a well-managed camera network. In addition, the survey found that cameras were more supported by respondents who both lived and worked in the Castro area, or by respondents who had personally been the victim of a crime.

New bars have been banned from the San Francisco neighborhood since 1987 unless they are replacing a previous drinking establishment. Supervisors could decide to change those zoning laws on Tuesday.

<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img src="https://content.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/GettyImages-529540728-2500x1668.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-4437"/><figcaption>The Castro Upper Market Community Benefit District&#8217;s unanimous vote on Monday wrapped a months-long process over whether cameras should be installed throughout the district. | Photo by Getty Images</figcaption></figure>

<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img src="https://content.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/GettyImages-529540728-2500x1668.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-4437"/><figcaption>The Castro Upper Market Community Benefit District's unanimous vote on Monday wrapped a months-long process over whether cameras should be installed throughout the district. | Photo by Getty Images</figcaption></figure>

<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img src="https://content.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/GettyImages-529540728-2500x1668.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-4437"/><figcaption>The Castro Upper Market Community Benefit District&#8217;s unanimous vote on Monday wrapped a months-long process over whether cameras should be installed throughout the district. | Photo by Getty Images</figcaption></figure>

The camera program’s opponents argued that survey questions such as “My opinion about the proposal to install safety cameras with a well-managed camera program with no direct access to the police or the public is&#8230;” were biased and priming.

The camera program’s opponents argued that survey questions such as “My opinion about the proposal to install safety cameras with a well-managed camera program with no direct access to the police or the public is...” were biased and priming.

The camera program’s opponents argued that survey questions such as “My opinion about the proposal to install safety cameras with a well-managed camera program with no direct access to the police or the public is&#8230;” were biased and priming.

They also argued that public cameras would not help with public safety, but instead increase police surveillance of underprivileged groups, pointing to a <a href="https://www.kqed.org/news/11841385/sf-police-used-camera-network-to-illegally-spy-on-protestors-new-lawsuit-alleges">lawsuit</a> alleging the SF Police Department improperly accessed cameras during last year’s Black Lives Matters protests.

They also argued that public cameras would not help with public safety, but instead increase police surveillance of underprivileged groups, pointing to a <a href="https://www.kqed.org/news/11841385/sf-police-used-camera-network-to-illegally-spy-on-protestors-new-lawsuit-alleges">lawsuit</a> alleging the SF Police Department improperly accessed cameras during last year’s Black Lives Matters protests.

“We were raising these concerns on day one&#8230;about the abuse of this technology to survey immigrants, peaceful protestors [and be] exploited and hacked to observe children in schools,” Lee Hepner, a legislative aide to Aaron Peskin, said at the meeting, referring to the fact that many community groups in the Castro felt the CBD had not taken their early concerns seriously.

“We were raising these concerns on day one...about the abuse of this technology to survey immigrants, peaceful protestors [and be] exploited and hacked to observe children in schools,” Lee Hepner, a legislative aide to Aaron Peskin, said at the meeting, referring to the fact that many community groups in the Castro felt the CBD had not taken their early concerns seriously.

“We were raising these concerns on day one&#8230;about the abuse of this technology to survey immigrants, peaceful protestors [and be] exploited and hacked to observe children in schools,” Lee Hepner, a legislative aide to Aaron Peskin, said at the meeting, referring to the fact that many community groups in the Castro felt the CBD had not taken their early concerns seriously.

Existing San Francisco data shows that public cameras can help deter certain crimes. Since 2005, there have been <a href="https://sfdem.org/community-safety-camera-locations">71 city-owned “Community Safety Cameras”</a> in San Francisco. In 2008, the City commissioned a <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2183381">184 page report</a> on whether the cameras were effective in deterring crime. The report found that the cameras had no impact on violent crimes such as assault, but did have a significant deterrent effect on property crimes, reducing property crimes by 24 percent within 100 feet of the cameras.

Existing San Francisco data shows that public cameras can help deter certain crimes. Since 2005, there have been <a href="https://sfdem.org/community-safety-camera-locations">71 city-owned “Community Safety Cameras”</a> in San Francisco. In 2008, the City commissioned a <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2183381">184 page report</a> on whether the cameras were effective in deterring crime. The report found that the cameras had no impact on violent crimes such as assault, but did have a significant deterrent effect on property crimes, reducing property crimes by 24 percent within 100 feet of the cameras.

One unlikely ally of the camera program is San Francisco’s district attorney’s office, led by <a href="https://sfstandard.com/chesa-boudin-explainer-district-attorney-san-francisco/">Chesa Boudin</a>, who campaigned for the position and won on a progressive, anti-incarceration platform. Chris Larsen recently <a href="https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/chesa-boudin-recall-supporters-are-fighting-will-it-hurt-their-movement/">donated $100,000</a> to the campaign opposing the recall of Boudin.&nbsp;

One unlikely ally of the camera program is San Francisco’s district attorney’s office, led by <a href="https://sfstandard.com/chesa-boudin-explainer-district-attorney-san-francisco/">Chesa Boudin</a>, who campaigned for the position and won on a progressive, anti-incarceration platform. Chris Larsen recently <a href="https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/chesa-boudin-recall-supporters-are-fighting-will-it-hurt-their-movement/">donated $100,000</a> to the campaign opposing the recall of Boudin.&nbsp;

“Some of my best cases are where I have people staring into the Nest cameras,” Assistant District Attorney Eric Quandt said at a <a href="https://hayesvalleysf.org/events/hayes-valley-public-safety-meeting/">Hayes Valley public safety meeting earlier this year</a>. He also noted that the burglars committing property crimes are professionals that are part of organized crime rings in the East Bay.&nbsp;

“Some of my best cases are where I have people staring into the Nest cameras,” Assistant District Attorney Eric Quandt said at a <a href="https://hayesvalleysf.org/events/hayes-valley-public-safety-meeting/">Hayes Valley public safety meeting earlier this year</a>. He also noted that the burglars committing property crimes are professionals that are part of organized crime rings in the East Bay.&nbsp;

Working with the police department, Japantown’s CBD implemented 119 cameras in burglary hotspots between 2018 and 2020, according to Grace Horikiri, the CBD’s executive director.

Working with the police department, Japantown’s CBD implemented 119 cameras in burglary hotspots between 2018 and 2020, according to Grace Horikiri, the CBD’s executive director.

“All in all it’s been a big benefit to our community, even though in the beginning I heard comments like ‘Oh, you’re going to have big brother watching,’” Horikiri said. “On Geary Boulevard between Laguna and Webster there used to be a lot of car break-ins, and I noticed that they lessened ever since the cameras have gone up.”&nbsp;

“All in all it’s been a big benefit to our community, even though in the beginning I heard comments like ‘Oh, you’re going to have big brother watching,’” Horikiri said. “On Geary Boulevard between Laguna and Webster there used to be a lot of car break-ins, and I noticed that they lessened ever since the cameras have gone up.”&nbsp;

Horikiri said that the CBD only reviews camera footage when a request comes in. She added that the footage has been used for a variety of purposes, from catching people who had been tagging Japantown with anti-Asian graffiti to providing car accident footage to insurance companies to providing footage to police of a store being broken into. In addition to catching criminals, camera footage has also been used to <a href="https://abc7news.com/innocent-people-san-francisco-public-defenders-office-sfpd-police/1067137/">exonerate wrongfully accused suspects</a>.

Horikiri said that the CBD only reviews camera footage when a request comes in. She added that the footage has been used for a variety of purposes, from catching people who had been tagging Japantown with anti-Asian graffiti to providing car accident footage to insurance companies to providing footage to police of a store being broken into. In addition to catching criminals, camera footage has also been used to <a href="https://abc7news.com/innocent-people-san-francisco-public-defenders-office-sfpd-police/1067137/">exonerate wrongfully accused suspects</a>.

Monday’s Castro meeting ended on a forward-looking note, with camera program opponents saying they were committed to exploring other alternatives for improving public safety.&nbsp;

Monday’s Castro meeting ended on a forward-looking note, with camera program opponents saying they were committed to exploring other alternatives for improving public safety.&nbsp;

“The CBD can rebuild some trust and bridge with the community organizations who have been very concerned with this up until this point….We would like to continue collaborating on community-based alternatives that keep our neighborhood safe,” Hepner said at the meeting, after the board voted ‘No.’

“The CBD can rebuild some trust and bridge with the community organizations who have been very concerned with this up until this point….We would like to continue collaborating on community-based alternatives that keep our neighborhood safe,” Hepner said at the meeting, after the board voted ‘No.’

After monthslong debate, Castro District rejects public safety cameras

Annie Gaus

One of two campaigns to recall San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin hits a key deadline this week, marking a turning point in how the efforts to bounce San Francisco’s controversial lead prosecutor may shake out.&nbsp;

One of two campaigns to recall San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin hits a key deadline this week, marking a turning point in how the efforts to bounce San Francisco’s controversial lead prosecutor may shake out.&nbsp;

The first campaign, called Committee Supporting The Recall Of District Attorney Chesa Boudin and launched by former Republican mayoral candidate Richie Greenberg, wrapped up its signature-gathering effort this week and has until Aug. 11 to deliver those signatures to the Department of Elections.&nbsp;

The first campaign, called Committee Supporting The Recall Of District Attorney Chesa Boudin and launched by former Republican mayoral candidate Richie Greenberg, wrapped up its signature-gathering effort this week and has until Aug. 11 to deliver those signatures to the Department of Elections.&nbsp;

The campaign is cautiously optimistic about meeting the signature threshold, said Greenberg. The recall campaigns must reach a threshold of 51,325 valid signatures ⁠—equivalent to 10% of registered voters in San Francisco⁠—in order to qualify for a special election, and signatures are reviewed by San Francisco’s Department of Elections for validity.

The campaign is cautiously optimistic about meeting the signature threshold, said Greenberg. The recall campaigns must reach a threshold of 51,325 valid signatures ⁠—equivalent to 10% of registered voters in San Francisco⁠—in order to qualify for a special election, and signatures are reviewed by San Francisco’s Department of Elections for validity.

“We are confident yet cautious because the amount of pushback [and] disinformation is brutal,” Greenberg said in an email.&nbsp;

“We are confident yet cautious because the amount of pushback [and] disinformation is brutal,” Greenberg said in an email.&nbsp;

Should Greenberg’s effort qualify, the second recall campaign⁠—called San Franciscans for Public Safety Supporting the Recall of Chesa Boudin⁠—would be canceled, and a special election to recall Boudin could be scheduled for as soon as November 2021. It’s not clear if it will ultimately meet the signature threshold, however: ​​Greenberg cited a high number of apparently fake signatures, which will be tossed out if found to be invalid.&nbsp;

Should Greenberg’s effort qualify, the second recall campaign⁠—called San Franciscans for Public Safety Supporting the Recall of Chesa Boudin⁠—would be canceled, and a special election to recall Boudin could be scheduled for as soon as November 2021. It’s not clear if it will ultimately meet the signature threshold, however: ​​Greenberg cited a high number of apparently fake signatures, which will be tossed out if found to be invalid.&nbsp;

The second campaign, launched by former San Francisco Democratic Party chair Mary Jung, has outraised the first campaign by a wide margin.&nbsp;

The second campaign, launched by former San Francisco Democratic Party chair Mary Jung, has outraised the first campaign by a wide margin.&nbsp;

As of Aug. 5, the most recent financial reporting date for political campaigns, San Franciscans for Public Safety had raised more than $708,000. Its largest single donor is a political action committee (PAC) called Neighbors for a Better San Francisco, which counts financiers Jason Moment, William Duhamel and Holden Spaht among its major contributors and has given $450,000 to the recall campaign, according to filings. Large individual, direct donors to the campaign include Garry Tan, co-founder of Initialized Capital, who contributed $50,000.

As of Aug. 5, the most recent financial reporting date for political campaigns, San Franciscans for Public Safety had raised more than $708,000. Its largest single donor is a political action committee (PAC) called Neighbors for a Better San Francisco, which counts financiers Jason Moment, William Duhamel and Holden Spaht among its major contributors and has given $450,000 to the recall campaign, according to filings. Large individual, direct donors to the campaign include Garry Tan, co-founder of Initialized Capital, who contributed $50,000.

“They&#8217;ve raised a bunch of money, and I think they have enough time and enough funding to qualify for the ballot,” said political consultant Jim Ross. “Signature gathering is basically a combination of time and money&#8230;there’s enough people in San Francisco who would sign that [recall petition].”

“They've raised a bunch of money, and I think they have enough time and enough funding to qualify for the ballot,” said political consultant Jim Ross. “Signature gathering is basically a combination of time and money...there’s enough people in San Francisco who would sign that [recall petition].”

“They&#8217;ve raised a bunch of money, and I think they have enough time and enough funding to qualify for the ballot,” said political consultant Jim Ross. “Signature gathering is basically a combination of time and money&#8230;there’s enough people in San Francisco who would sign that [recall petition].”

Underpinning both recall efforts is a sense among many San Franciscans that the city has become less safe.&nbsp;

Underpinning both recall efforts is a sense among many San Franciscans that the city has become less safe.&nbsp;

Citywide polling data suggest that concerns about crime are widespread and growing: A May 2021 poll by EMC Research found that crime was the top concern for 27% of San Franciscans surveyed. That was the second most-common response, trailing only homelessness at 30%. Since the onset of the pandemic, crime issues have surged past cost of living, transportation and housing as one of the top three concerns cited by residents.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Citywide polling data suggest that concerns about crime are widespread and growing: A May 2021 poll by EMC Research found that crime was the top concern for 27% of San Franciscans surveyed. That was the second most-common response, trailing only homelessness at 30%. Since the onset of the pandemic, crime issues have surged past cost of living, transportation and housing as one of the top three concerns cited by residents.&nbsp;&nbsp;

core/html

Police data suggest that the pandemic turned crime trends in San Francisco upside down. Auto burglaries⁠—which comprise the single largest category of crime reports⁠ in a typical year—shrunk dramatically as tourists avoided the city last year. Homicides and shootings <a href="https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/mid-year-san-francisco-crime-statistics-show-gun-violence-auto-break-ins-down/">ticked up</a>, and burglaries targeting <a href="https://sfstandard.com/interactive-map-san-franciscos-uneven-burglary-spikes-by-neighborhood/">both homes and businesses</a> surged. Larceny reports fell as businesses shuttered en masse, yet high-profile instances of aggressive or repeated shoplifting at certain businesses <a href="https://sfstandard.com/repeat-shoplifters-are-driving-s-f-retail-crime-according-to-police/">drew scrutiny</a> and raised concerns about a lack of deterrence for repeat offenders.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Police data suggest that the pandemic turned crime trends in San Francisco upside down. Auto burglaries⁠—which comprise the single largest category of crime reports⁠ in a typical year—shrunk dramatically as tourists avoided the city last year. Homicides and shootings <a href="https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/mid-year-san-francisco-crime-statistics-show-gun-violence-auto-break-ins-down/">ticked up</a>, and burglaries targeting <a href="https://sfstandard.com/interactive-map-san-franciscos-uneven-burglary-spikes-by-neighborhood/">both homes and businesses</a> surged. Larceny reports fell as businesses shuttered en masse, yet high-profile instances of aggressive or repeated shoplifting at certain businesses <a href="https://sfstandard.com/repeat-shoplifters-are-driving-s-f-retail-crime-according-to-police/">drew scrutiny</a> and raised concerns about a lack of deterrence for repeat offenders.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Tan, a longtime Democrat who said he hadn’t participated heavily in local issues prior to the DA recall, told Here/Say he was spurred to support the recall effort by the high-profile attacks of Asian-American seniors in San Francisco.

Tan, a longtime Democrat who said he hadn’t participated heavily in local issues prior to the DA recall, told Here/Say he was spurred to support the recall effort by the high-profile attacks of Asian-American seniors in San Francisco.

“It hit my radar just because we increasingly saw, basically, people who look like my grandmother being stabbed and robbed in the streets,” Tan said. “There are candidates out there who will be able to find that line between getting the reform that we need⁠—and helping the people in society that need help⁠—while also keeping the city safe.”&nbsp;

“It hit my radar just because we increasingly saw, basically, people who look like my grandmother being stabbed and robbed in the streets,” Tan said. “There are candidates out there who will be able to find that line between getting the reform that we need⁠—and helping the people in society that need help⁠—while also keeping the city safe.”&nbsp;

On the side against the recall, two committees supporting Boudin have collectively raised just shy of $500,000.

On the side against the recall, two committees supporting Boudin have collectively raised just shy of $500,000.

One committee, called Friends of Chesa Boudin Against the Recall, raised $277,000 as of Aug. 5. Its largest single donor is Chris Larsen, a tech entrepreneur who has also bankrolled a network of <a href="https://sfstandard.com/after-months-long-debate-castro-district-rejects-public-safety-cameras/">private security cameras</a> in San Francisco.&nbsp;

One committee, called Friends of Chesa Boudin Against the Recall, raised $277,000 as of Aug. 5. Its largest single donor is Chris Larsen, a tech entrepreneur who has also bankrolled a network of <a href="https://sfstandard.com/after-months-long-debate-castro-district-rejects-public-safety-cameras/">private security cameras</a> in San Francisco.&nbsp;

The second committee, San Franciscans Against the Recall of Chesa Boudin, is sponsored by the Real Justice PAC, which has given $100,000 of that committee’s $214,500 total haul.&nbsp;

The second committee, San Franciscans Against the Recall of Chesa Boudin, is sponsored by the Real Justice PAC, which has given $100,000 of that committee’s $214,500 total haul.&nbsp;

Incorporated in San Francisco, Real Justice PAC received $750,000 in donations from Open Philanthropy, a fund created by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz and his wife Cari Tuna. Tuna also separately contributed $50,000, among other contributors.&nbsp;

Incorporated in San Francisco, Real Justice PAC received $750,000 in donations from Open Philanthropy, a fund created by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz and his wife Cari Tuna. Tuna also separately contributed $50,000, among other contributors.&nbsp;

Real Justice PAC, which was co-founded by the controversial activist Shaun King, has given funds to support Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascon and Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner, among others. Patty Quillin, the wife of Netflix founder Reed Hastings, is a contributor to Real Justice PAC and Smart Justice California Action Fund, which each donated to the anti-recall efforts.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Real Justice PAC, which was co-founded by the controversial activist Shaun King, has given funds to support Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascon and Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner, among others. Patty Quillin, the wife of Netflix founder Reed Hastings, is a contributor to Real Justice PAC and Smart Justice California Action Fund, which each donated to the anti-recall efforts.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

The Friends of Chesa Boudin Against the Recall committee describes the recall campaigns as a costly and distracting initiative “fueled by fear-mongering” and points to Boudin’s elimination of cash bail, efforts to prosecute police officers and other initiatives as examples of his success in office. Supporting organizations listed on its website include Our Revolution, a political action group spun out of Sen. Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaigns, the climate activist group Sunrise Bay Area and the American Federation of Teachers Local 2121, among others.&nbsp;

The Friends of Chesa Boudin Against the Recall committee describes the recall campaigns as a costly and distracting initiative “fueled by fear-mongering” and points to Boudin’s elimination of cash bail, efforts to prosecute police officers and other initiatives as examples of his success in office. Supporting organizations listed on its website include Our Revolution, a political action group spun out of Sen. Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaigns, the climate activist group Sunrise Bay Area and the American Federation of Teachers Local 2121, among others.&nbsp;

The second, Democratic-led recall campaign has until Oct. 25 to deliver 51,532 valid signatures, and expects to exceed the signature threshold: The campaign said on Aug. 11 that it had collected more than 50,000 signatures. It is aiming for at least 70,000 signatures to account for any invalid petitions.&nbsp;

The second, Democratic-led recall campaign has until Oct. 25 to deliver 51,532 valid signatures, and expects to exceed the signature threshold: The campaign said on Aug. 11 that it had collected more than 50,000 signatures. It is aiming for at least 70,000 signatures to account for any invalid petitions.&nbsp;

Should its signature-gathering effort succeed, the recall campaign will thrust both the pro- and anti-recall coalitions on a fast track to a special election in the coming months.&nbsp;

Should its signature-gathering effort succeed, the recall campaign will thrust both the pro- and anti-recall coalitions on a fast track to a special election in the coming months.&nbsp;

The Democratic recall campaign expects an election to occur either in February or June 2022, according to Andrea Shorter, the campaign spokesperson. Unlike the recall effort targeting California Governor Gavin Newsom, a recall election of Boudin would not come with a concurrent election of alternative candidates; instead, Mayor London Breed would appoint a replacement according to the city’s charter.

The Democratic recall campaign expects an election to occur either in February or June 2022, according to Andrea Shorter, the campaign spokesperson. Unlike the recall effort targeting California Governor Gavin Newsom, a recall election of Boudin would not come with a concurrent election of alternative candidates; instead, Mayor London Breed would appoint a replacement according to the city’s charter.

Recall elections in San Francisco are rare, and include a failed recall attempt of Dianne Feinstein, then-Mayor of San Francisco, in 1983.&nbsp;

Recall elections in San Francisco are rare, and include a failed recall attempt of Dianne Feinstein, then-Mayor of San Francisco, in 1983.&nbsp;

This year, in addition to the recall petitions targeting Boudin, three members of the San Francisco Board of Education are facing a recall campaign spurred largely by outrage over the slow pace of public school reopenings. Voters across California will also decide whether to recall Newsom in a special election scheduled for Sept. 14.&nbsp;

This year, in addition to the recall petitions targeting Boudin, three members of the San Francisco Board of Education are facing a recall campaign spurred largely by outrage over the slow pace of public school reopenings. Voters across California will also decide whether to recall Newsom in a special election scheduled for Sept. 14.&nbsp;

Chesa Boudin recall campaigns sprint to signature-gathering deadlines

Week 5: Nima Momeni trial

Join Jonah Owen Lamb and Beki San Martin Friday to talk about everything this week in the Nima Momeni trial from martial arts, stab wounds, reactions in the court and more.

Kawakami & Lombardi Talk 49ers

San Francisco Standard sports columnists Tim Kawakami and David Lombardi discuss the Niners' 2024 season.

Week 4: Nima Momeni trial

Developments in the Bob Lee murder trial: This Friday, Jonah Owen Lamb and Beki San Martin will talk about how Nima Momeni’s defense team is building its case. And, as always, we’ll answer your questions about the trial.

A post-election conversation with Congressman Ro Khanna

Join The Standard's Politics Editor Annie Gaus as she sits down with Congressman Ro Khanna to discuss the outcomes of the election and its implications for San Francisco and beyond.

Week 3: Nima Momeni trial

Join Standard reporters Jonah Owen Lamb and Beki San Martin as they share the week's updates they witnessed at the courthouse, and take viewers' questions about the past, present, and future of the trial.

Post-election Q+A with The Standard's Politics team

Reeling from Election day? Burning questions about what's next? Join The Standard's politics team to debrief, decompress, and discuss the results and open questions of the SF Election 2024.

Post-election Q+A with The Standard’s Politics team

Tech’s Political Shift: A Conversation with Roy Bahat

The technology industry has historically been one of Democratic candidates' largest sources of support, both with large dollar donations from its leaders and high support amongst employees. But this year's election cycle has cracked open a new chasm in the community. Kevin Truong sits down with Head of Bloomberg Beta, Roy Bahat, to discuss the split and what's behind it.

Kawakami & Lombardi Talk 49ers & Chiefs

San Francisco Standard sports columnists Tim Kawakami and David Lombardi recap the 49ers' biggest game of the season: the Super Bowl rematch versus the Kansas City Chiefs.

Search Results for: chris larsen

Lawsuit alleging SFPD illegally used live surveillance to spy on protesters finally gets its day in court

Opinion: Tech leaders: Stop whining about SF’s problems, and start helping

After monthslong debate, Castro District rejects public safety cameras

Chesa Boudin recall campaigns sprint to signature-gathering deadlines