Skip to main content
City Hall

Order Banning Homeless Sweeps Puts SF in ‘Impossible Situation,’ Says City Attorney

Written by David SjostedtPublished Jan. 03, 2023 • 4:58pm
San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu stands behind a speaker at a press meeting held at City Hall. | Benjamin Fanjoy for The Standard

English

San Francisco’s city attorney filed a motion pushing back on a federal judge’s recent order prohibiting the city from destroying homeless encampments unless there are sufficient shelter options. 

In the filing, City Attorney David Chiu asked U.S. Magistrate Judge Donna Ryu to clarify what it means to be “involuntarily homeless” and questioned whether the city can clear encampments if inhabitants refuse shelter. Ryu issued a preliminary order on Dec. 23 that the city was violating its own policies, as well as federal precedent, by destroying homeless encampments without offering adequate access to shelter.

Chiu said in a statement that Ryu’s ruling potentially conflicts with a previous federal court settlement that requires San Francisco to take enforcement action against people who refuse shelter. 

“The Court’s order puts San Francisco in an impossible situation,” Chiu said in a press release. “It defies logic to require that San Francisco have shelter for all persons experiencing homelessness before San Francisco may enforce these laws against any one person, even after that individual has refused adequate shelter.”

Chiu cited a 2020 lawsuit by UC Hastings law school, which accused the city of ignoring the health and safety of housed Tenderloin residents by allowing encampments to proliferate in the area. That lawsuit ended in a settlement stipulating that the city remove tents from the area.

Ryu’s ruling was based on a federal precedent set in Martin v. Boise, a 2018 ruling that found that removing homeless encampments without providing shelter was a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s protections against cruel and unusual punishment. 

“San Francisco must also be able to balance our legal obligations,” Chiu said.

Filed by the Coalition on Homelessness, the lawsuit alleged that the city doesn’t follow the precedent set in Martin v. Boise or its own policies for removing homeless encampments.  

The lawsuit seeks an injunction that would incentivize the city to create more affordable housing, which advocates say is the solution to the crisis.

English

David Sjostedt can be reached at [email protected]


San Francisco Appeals Court Order Banning Homeless Sweeps, Citing ‘Impossible Situation’

San Francisco Appeals Court Order Banning Homeless Sweeps, Citing ‘Impossible Situation’


Supervisors Confront Housing Plan, $728M Budget Shortfall

Supervisors Confront Housing Plan, $728M Budget Shortfall


Bay Area Lawmakers Push State To Shore Up Cash-Strapped Transit Agencies

Bay Area Lawmakers Push State To Shore Up Cash-Strapped Transit Agencies


San Francisco Looks To Hike Penalties for Illegal Construction

San Francisco Looks To Hike Penalties for Illegal Construction


Supervisors Mull Preferences for Women, Minorities, Veterans in City Contracts 

Supervisors Mull Preferences for Women, Minorities, Veterans in City Contracts 



Stay on top of what’s happening in your city

SF’s most important stories, delivered straight to your inbox



By clicking Subscribe you confirm you have read and agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge our Privacy Policy