Now Reading
Killing of 84-Year-Old Thai Grandfather Heads to Murder Trial: “I feel relieved today,” Daughter Says
Thursday, June 30, 2022

Killing of 84-Year-Old Thai Grandfather Heads to Murder Trial: “I feel relieved today,” Daughter Says

The high-profile killing of a an 84-year-old Thai American man in San Francisco will proceed to trial with the accused facing murder and elder abuse charges, a judge decided on Friday.

Vicha Ratanapakdee was walking on a January 2021 morning when he was violently pushed to the ground in the Anza Vista neighborhood. He died shortly after the incident, which was caught on camera and galvanized the Stop Asian Hate Movement nationwide.

More than 500 days after the incident, San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Darwin ruled that the evidence presented by the District Attorney’s Office is enough for a murder trial. 

A lawyer for Antoine Watson, the defendant, argued that the case should be charged as involuntary manslaughter because he had no intent to kill.

Monthanus Ratanapakdee, daughter of Vicha Ratanapakdee an 84-year-old Thai man who died after a fatal attack while on his morning walk in the Anza Vista neighborhood, speaks during Asian Justice Rally, a national rally on the anniversary of the death of her father, on Sunday, Jan. 30, 2022 in San Francisco. | Ekevara Kitpowsong for The Standard

A dozen Asian community activists—including Monthanus Ratanapakdee, the victim’s daughter—attended Friday’s hearing.

“I feel relieved today,” she said after the judge’s decision. “I couldn’t sleep last night.”

She said she was shaking during the proceedings, and she burst into tears when attorneys brought up details of the incident.

The next step in the case involves setting a trial date and selecting a jury.

One of the key arguments prosecutors presented Friday was that the incident met the standard of “implied malice” required for a murder charge. Assistant District Attorney Sean Connolly said Watson was allegedly yelling, “What the f**k are you looking at?” before the push. 

But defense attorney Anita Nabha challenged the idea that Watson’s statement was directed at the victim. She said Watson was in mental distress. 

The other argument centered on whether Watson knew about Ratanapakdee’s age. The prosecutor said the victim walked slowly, making it fairly obvious how old he was. But the defense countered that it would have been hard to tell because Ratanapakdee wore a mask and a cap.

See Also
Monthanus Ratanapakdee, daughter of Vicha Ratanapakdee, wears a “Justice for Vicha” pin at the preliminary hearing in San Francisco, Calif., on Friday, June 17th, 2022. | Juliana Yamada/The Standard

Watson appeared in court Friday—as did his supporters. According to Nabha, Watson was born and raised in San Francisco, and spent his early childhood just a couple of blocks away from where the incident occurred.

“He (Watson) is loved and his family stands firmly behind him during this horrible chapter in his young life,” Nabha said.

Nabha—who’s also Asian American—acknowledged that the incident incited anger in the Asian American community. However valid those feelings, she said they can be “misplaced.” She also noted that because of the high-profile status of the case, it’s possible that public and political pressure swayed the DA’s charging decision.

The defense also filed a motion for Watson’s release, which the court will hear next week. 

Arraignment is set for July 1. The trial date is unclear and expected to be delayed because of a backlog in the court.

Han Li can be reached at [email protected].
  • I realize it’s Ma. Nabha’s job to defend her client but that excuse for Mr. Watson’s behavior is just pathetic. To understand how weak it is, all you need to do is substitute defendants:

    “ “He (Rittenhouse) is loved and his family stands firmly behind him during this horrible chapter in his young life”

    His attorney acknowledged that the incident incited anger. However valid those feelings, she said they can be “misplaced.” She also noted that because of the high-profile status of the case, it’s possible that public and political pressure swayed the DA’s charging decision.”

    Murder is murder; almost everyone on this site can agree that excuse was lame in Kenosha. Guess what? It’s still lame here. And hopefully Watson’s supporters are savvy enough to see that too.

  • The feelings are misplaced. A dead old man vs a young future Mayor of SF. We got to save the Young man and give him yet another chance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.