Now Reading
$118M From City Reserves for Asian American Reparations? Four Supes Want It—Mayor Breed Is Against It
Monday, July 04, 2022

$118M From City Reserves for Asian American Reparations? Four Supes Want It—Mayor Breed Is Against It

After Mayor London Breed declined to carve out $100 million in her spending plan for reparations requested by a coalition of Asian American groups, four supervisors want to tap city reserves to fund the community’s ask.

The call for reparations stems from a resolution the city passed earlier this year to officially apologize to the Chinese community for past racist policies such as the Chinese Exclusion Act. But some political leaders and AAPI nonprofits said they want more than just an apology and urged the city to go beyond verbal consolation.

“We have to actually put our money where our mouth is,” Supervisor Aaron Peskin said. “Apologizing is easy, but paying for it is more difficult.”

The supervisors are asking for $118 million in two years to create the “API Equity Fund”—an $18 million increase from the original proposal by the API Council. 

Under the plan being floated this week, the money will be used for buying land and bankrolling construction projects, among other things, according to Supervisor Connie Chan, who introduced the ordinance.

San Francisco Supervisor Connie Chan speaks to members of the Asian and Pacific Islander community on Tuesday, June 14, 2021 to announce the proposed API Equity Fund at City Hall in San Francisco. | Brian Feulner for The Standard

Chan said the property purchases and investments in the AAPI nonprofits will allow them to “gain economic stability and remain rooted in the communities” they serve.

The proposed funding represents a one-time investment spread out over the next two years. 

Supervisor Gordon Mar and Ahsha Safai—along with nonprofit leaders from the Chinese, Vietnamese, Filipino and Samoan communities—attended a rally Tuesday to voice support for the plan.

Breed, however, opposed the method of tapping into the general reserve for the proposed funding, instead emphasizing that the current investment in the AAPI community has been “significant.”

See Also

“Using our reserve could jeopardize our city’s long-term fiscal health, especially with great uncertainties around our economy ahead,” Mason Lee, a spokesperson for Breed, said in a written statement.

Lee said that Breed’s budget decision is “fiscally responsible for all San Franciscans” and said that the mayor and the city have long been committed to supporting API community organizations.

Lee added that Breed’s budget has funded about $3.5 million of proposed services and community programs from the API Council’s ask and another $3 million for the AAPI organizations outside of the council’s list. According to Lee, current active contracts between City departments and organizations within the API Council total over $268 million, with at least $100 million in remaining contract spending available.

After its introduction Tuesday at the Board of Supervisors, the legislation will head to the budget subcommittee in July for discussion, amendment and initial decision. It will need six votes to pass the full board—or eight votes to override a mayoral veto.

Han Li can be reached at [email protected].
  • So Mayor Breed wants his brother released early from prison for murder, willing to fund a fentanyl shoot up murder den but unwilling to provide $ for Asians ? Explains a lot. Only BLM. No other lives matter. I don’t blame her. Sups like Conny Chen and Gordon Mar will kiss up to get her vote to go to Congress some day. Got to sell out on a few Asian lives to climb to the top commie style.

  • Asians are 35% of SF. They are not asking for “repatriations”. I don’t know a single Asian in SF asking for this. Connie represents herself as usual and her personal interest and relationship with “non profits”. What Asians ARE Asking for is action against criminals. Now that Connie will refuse to support because it’s not aligned with her white interest.

  • The Chinese Exclusion Act was a federal law, not a city or state law. If reparations are sought due to it, they should be sought from the federal government. In addition, any reparations program should be means tested, so those who don’t need the assistance don’t get it. Some segments of the AAPI community are well to do and well educated.

  • Almost any group that was not part of the first wave of colonists, and I mean the Dutch and English, could claim that they were mistreated, harassed, and discriminated against, as were the Chinese. But there are two groups in America that did not come here, willing to risk hardship of all kinds, to find a better life. These are the Native Americans who were already here, and the African Americans who were kidnaped and forced to come. Reparations should be reserved for the descendants of these two groups. The rest of us can blame our grandparents for any hardship we still face.

  • Reparations are not a good idea. This implies the current people own something to the great great grandchildren of those who were not treated properly. This only continues the resentment or misplaced animosity. All people, today, should have equal access to all, but not given it. Reparations are only a political means for a political group to stay in power. It really does not help only hinders.

  • @Sean you need to widen your history lesson. The Chinese did not chose to come to America either. Thats where the term shanghaied came from. Many were tricked to come to America to mine for gold only to be sold to build railways. That said I agree with @Zhong. No Chinese would ask for $. It’s not in their culture to do that. This is a ruse from politicians looking for kickback opportunities.

  • Reparations begin with the original land owners: the Indians!
    500,000 Native Americans were slaughtered in California at $5 a head. They lived in this land first. It was stolen from them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.