Skip to main content
Sports

New California bill would ban youth tackle football

A similar bill was pulled in 2018.

Young football players in helmets practice tackling drills on a field while a coach gives instructions and teammates watch.
Kevin Smith, president of Concord-Carlisle Pop Warner Football (center), coaches a one-on-one drill during practice in Concord, Massachusetts, on Aug. 16, 2012. | Barry Chin/The Boston Globe via Getty Images | Source: Boston Globe via Getty Images

State Assemblymember Kevin McCarty—not to be confused with Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy—has introduced a bill that aims to ban tackle football for children under the age of 12 in California.

McCarty, a Democrat who represents Assembly District 6, covering some of Sacramento’s eastern suburbs, proposed a similar bill in 2018. That bill, AB 2108 (opens in new tab), was pulled before it could reach a committee hearing after it was met with resistance from grassroots organizations.

McCarty is the sole author of this year’s bill, AB 734 (opens in new tab). His 2018 effort was co-authored by Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, who became known around the state for introducing AB 5, a controversial labor rights law known as the Gig Worker Bill, in 2019.

The 2018 anti-tackle football bill also listed four Bay Area representatives as co-authors: Rob Bonta, Kevin Mullin, Bill Quirk and Philip Ting. Of those four, only Ting still serves in the state assembly.

“I think there’s a conversation to be had about youth sports in general and making it as safe as possible, but banning youth football before the age of 12 isn’t the best thing,” said Riordan head football coach Adhir Ravipati. “There are a lot of kids who play youth football that do so to get away from a bad home life. Youth sports build character and teach the value of teamwork.”

Listen toSection 415
1 day ago

Section 415: Steph Curry, Jonathan Kuminga, and a Warriors season preview

A Golden State Warriors player, wearing jersey number 00, dribbles a basketball on a court filled with seated fans.
5 days ago

Section 415: After the 49ers’ 4-1 start, what’s a realistic outcome for this season?

A man wearing a black 49ers cap and white NFL shirt speaks, gesturing with his right hand near a microphone. Red and black helmet images frame him.
Tuesday, Oct. 7

Section 415: Buster Posey talks manager qualities, his first year on the job, and more

A man in a gray suit stands at a microphone with the San Francisco Giants logo, with repeated red and black images of baseball gloves and bats on the left.

Ravipati is extremely familiar with concussions and neuroscience. He served as the vice president of product at Protxx, where he helped develop a sensor worn behind the ear that can help detect concussions. His team at Menlo-Atherton wore those sensors during the 2018 season.

“Football isn’t the only youth sport with concerns about head injuries,” Ravipati said. “It’s stigmatized more than in soccer or lacrosse. It may be more prevalent in football, but other sports aren’t exempt from those issues.”

“The game has changed a lot even since I stopped playing,” said Ravipati, who played his final season of college ball at Northeastern in 2010. “One of the problems is that you still have a lot of old-school coaches who are trying to teach tackling the way they were taught, instead of considering new techniques.”

Much of the support for the 2018 bill will likely be revived for AB 734, which advocated for kids to play flag football instead of tackle football.

“Flag football has its value,” added Ravipati, who saw one of his players suffer a concussion in 2021 on an unnecessary hit some 30 yards away from the play. “It teaches you how to pass the ball and play in open space, whereas youth tackle football is mostly played with tight, run-heavy formations. But both have value.”

The proposed bill could take effect on Jan. 1, 2026, if it is successful.

Assemblymember McCarty was contacted for comment.