Skip to main content
News

SF schools chief wants a new contract. Teachers union says thanks, but no thanks

Superintendent Maria Su says she lifted SFUSD out of a crisis. The union isn’t satisfied.

Maria Su’s contract is set to expire at the end of this school year. | Source: Morgan Ellis/The Standard

Last fall, Maria Su was approaching her 16th year as executive director of the San Francisco Department of Children, Youth and Their Families, a city agency that has doled out hundreds of millions of dollars for kids, parents, and young adults since the early 1990s.

While Su had little, if any, experience in K-12 school leadership, the responsibilities she had and the connections she made during her time at the department gave her legitimacy when Mayor London Breed in October 2024 made her superintendent of the San Francisco Unified School District.

Su recollects that the district was “bleeding on the emergency floor” after Superintendent Matt Wayne had abruptly resigned following the chaotically canceled rollout of a school-closure plan.

“My goal at that time was really just to stop the bleeding,” Su said in a Q&A last month at Manny’s Café.

In the year since, she said, the district’s most pressing issues, including its controversial curricula and an archaic payroll system, have been solved — or at least ameliorated.

A white dome-shaped government building with columns stands before a blue semicircle, framed by a red border on the left and top sides.

Keeping tabs on SF’s movers and shakers.

Get the inside scoop on City Hall and local politics in our weekly Power Play newsletter.

Su’s performance has been positive enough to garner the support of a new mayor, Daniel Lurie, who wants to see her continue in the post beyond her current contract, according to sources with direct knowledge of the district. The SF Parents Coalition said last month that Su has “higher favorability” than her two predecessors.

But as Su’s contract (opens in new tab) is set to expire in June, at the end of this school year, her confidence that the district is better off now than it was before she took the helm is being questioned by the teachers union. So are her qualifications as an educational leader. The president of the United Educators of San Francisco, Cassondra Curiel, told The Standard over the weekend that keeping Su on as superintendent would be irresponsible.

“This person is not an educator. They have never run a school or worked in one,” Curiel said. “The board would be making a huge mistake in not seeking an actual superintendent candidate for the next school year.”

Curiel said the union is grateful to Su for stepping in to help the district during a time of great urgency, but its members don’t consider her an effective manager.

Among their grievances, Curiel said, are that the new payroll system has arguably worse problems than its predecessor; that substitute teachers and paraeducators are not getting appropriate terms of employment; and that the budget is not on a clear path toward stabilization, despite Su promoting it as such.

Because of the rushed nature of her appointment, Su is on the city’s payroll, with the school district loaning money to pay her salary. That contract seems unlikely to be extended by the city. This means that the only path forward for the district is to make Su an official SFUSD employee, or to find a new superintendent by summer — a process that can take an entire school year.

Curiel said the union has been speaking with board members behind the scenes for months to convince them to begin searching for a superintendent sooner rather than later.

Over the last few years, SFUSD’s unions have proved effective in having their most fervent demands granted by the district. In October 2023, the district granted credentialed teachers (opens in new tab) a $9,000 raise for that school year and a subsequent 5% pay bump for the next. Last week, the administrators union won a $7,500 pay bump and a 2% raise for the next three years.

Su has gone out of her way to curry favor from the union. Over the summer, the superintendent made an about-face on her promise to prominent local figures, including Lurie, that the district’s homegrown ethnic studies curriculum, which had become a two-semester graduation requirement starting in 2024-25, would be suspended for 2025-26 so that it could be vetted for politically charged content.

In the meantime, Su has lacked the job security to pursue some of her most important and ambitious goals for the district, such as the expansion of mental health and special education offerings, the opening of a second Mandarin immersion school as soon as 2027, and possible school closures.

“Families, everywhere I go, want more diversity in options and programs,” she said at Manny’s. “It’s about reorganizing.”

Do you think Maria Su should have her contract renewed? Answer our reader poll here (opens in new tab).

Ezra Wallach can be reached at [email protected]